Speaking at Mojocon yesterday in Dublin, Ireland
Yesterday, I was a speaker at MojoCon, a conference on Mobile Journalism, held in Dublin, Ireland.
The topic was, obviously, Mobile Journalism – that is, using iPhones and such to work as a reporter.
Which is fine and valid.
But live by the technology, die by the technology.
And journalism is about to die by the technology.
Which is too bad, but… unavoidable.
As journalists, we can stand by and watch as job after job, career after career is obviated by the exponentially growing power of tech.
This process starts small: Elevator operators (or lift drivers as we say in the UK) are replaced by do-it-yourself push buttons. Factory workers are replaced by robots. Bank tellers are replaced by ATM machines. (We all like ATM machines. Who wants to stand on line to cash a check (or cheque)? Amazon.com wipes out store clerks and small shops. Every time we make an online purchase of music, we wipe out another record store (records??). The list rolls on and on. It is the inevitable consequence of technology and the tyranny of Moore’s Law – the tech just keeps getting faster, better and cheaper.
Soon lawyers will be replaced by software that gins up all that boilerplate, – much faster and far less expensively. The FT today reports that both Google and Johnson & Johnson are gearing up for ‘cutting edge healthcare with robotic surgeons’.
And now comes journalism.
There are 3 billion people around the world with iPhones or smart phones in their pockets.
Those phones are not just phones (clearly), but, among other things, remarkably powerful platforms for journalism. You can write on them, shoot photos, record and edit video and even live stream – and upload it all up to the Internet and a waiting world of a few billion viewers, and all for free.
At MojoCon, 600 or so reporters are learning how to use smart phones and their remarkable power to report on events around the world simply, easily and efficiently. But if those ‘journalists’ can use those tools, so can anyone else. And so WILL everyone else. There is no barrier to being a journalist. Anyone can do it. And they do. This is the content that fills Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Meerkat and so on. All ‘news and information’ – all filled by a billion people ‘reporting’ all the time for free.
So the ‘job’ of the professional journalist is as dead as the elevator operator.
Sorry.
That’s technology for you.
We all like the idea of the driverless car. Except it is the end of the careers of truck drivers, taxi drivers, bus drivers and so on.
So too with the smart phone.
Today, the world’s biggest taxi company, UBER, (with a valuation of $30B), does not own a single taxi.
The world’s biggest hotelier, Airbnb does not own a single hotel room.
In the not too distant future, the world’s biggest and most powerful news and media company will not employ a single journalist.
The model is already here.
All that is needed is someone who can put this all together.
How hard could that be?
2 Comments
Greg Flakus March 28, 2015
Excellent points and very well said. But journalism is still needed because human beings still need another human being to examine, analyze and explain events. Just reporting that such and such happened to so and so on a particular day can be done by a computer, but going deeper into why it is important and telling the compelling human story requires a human being. If we get to the point where AI is so advanced it can do that then it will not just be journalists who are threatened.
One big problem I see is that demand for good reporting has dropped off. Younger people seem to want everything packaged in short sentences or headlines. They will stick around longer if it can be presented in an entertaining way (John Stewart’s comedy news), but a large percentage of them don’t follow news events at all.
The threat of this inattention is to democracy. If citizens are not well informed and somewhat engaged, you have dismally low voter turnout and politicians who only have to worry about the people wth big bucks. This is exacerbated by having about two thirds of the people who do vote committed in a tribal sense to either the right or the left and unwilling to let any argument or any fact disturb their firmly set mind sets.
GF
Michael Rosenblum March 29, 2015
Greg! Nice to hear from you. Long time, no see. How is everything going?