For more than 35 years, Michael Rosenblum has been on the cutting edge of the digital video journalism revolution. During this time, he has lead a drive for video literacy, and the complete rethinking of how television is made and controlled.
His work has included: The complete transitioning of The BBC's national network (UK) to a VJ-driven model, starting in 2002. The complete conversion of The Voice of America, the United State's Government's broadcasting agency, (and the largest broadcaster in the world), from short wave radio to television broadcasting and webcasting using the VJ paradigm (1998-present). The construction of NYT Television, a New York Times Company, and the largest producer of non-fiction television in the US. Rosenblum was both the founder and President of NYT TV, (all based on this paradigm (1996-1998). The President and Founder of Video News International, a global VJ-driven newsgathering company, with more than 100 journalists around the world. (1993-1996). Other clients include Spectrum News, Verizon and CBS News.
…why don’t y0u even have the courage to give contact information. Typical.
Typical troll mentality on the web Michael. Don’t expect anything more from the detractors – I know I haven’t.
rosenblumtvJune 13, 2008
what in the hell are you talking about? And why don’t y0u even have the courage to give contact information. Typical.
csusandmanJune 12, 2008
From his Contact Info: Michael@Rosenblumtv.com Note: I am more than happy to discuss my ideas, concepts and projects. However, personal attacks will be removed.
That last line is hilarious. He can’t stand on his own two feet on other boards and he can’t here either. What the hell:
I agree with $, though I won’t be as eloquent.
…you hack…
MickMay 19, 2008
Is this bloke on drugs?
Look in your dictionary under Oxygen-Thief, should see his picture there.
$May 17, 2008
So the bad camera work doesn’t matter?
I guess J.K. Rowling didn’t need to worry about grammar or punctuation? I guess her formal, years long university training as an English teacher, had nothing to do with her fine creative writing abilities.
I look at that example of work, produced by a man who claims to know so much and wanting people to pay him to learn what he knows.
Then I laugh.
It’s like seeing a house, poorly built, that is falling down, then paying the contractor who built it to make one for you to live in.
By the way, the J.K. Rowling story related in that poorly shot video is full of false information about her and how she wrote the book.
!May 17, 2008
“wicked fine sense of humor”
that’ll come in handy… on his resume.
Jay RussellMay 16, 2008
Good job on your message. Just getting out and doing it can pay off, worrying about how it is shot is an obvious response to stale jealous minds searching for the opportunity to reveal that they do believe in time alone and self gratification in petting zoos. Call me for new joke material!!!!
peterMay 16, 2008
not sure I agree with everything you say $, but you have a wicked fine sense of humor
$May 16, 2008
It was so poorly shot that it made it difficult to listen to whatever was being said. The poor shooting distracted from the message.
See, in visual communications, when one uses a camera as part of the message delivery process, the visuals should add to the audio. Not detract.
But you, with all your years of experience would know that. I’m sure Fred Friendly might even have mentioned something about how this is supposed to be tv, not radio. Or in your case, youtube, not an audio podcast.
Peter RalphMay 16, 2008
$ – I thought that too, then I saw the little rabbit waving and the whole thing made sense.
rosenblumtvMay 16, 2008
Yes. And what did you think of the story, or did’t you follow?
$May 16, 2008
Buy a light or at the very least learn not to shoot someone in front of a bright window. I am so impressed with your camera work. It’s a fine example of how well you know how to do your job.
Cliff EtzelMay 16, 2008
Thanks for the pep talk Michael – great way to end the week.
13 Comments
Cliff Etzel June 13, 2008
Typical troll mentality on the web Michael. Don’t expect anything more from the detractors – I know I haven’t.
rosenblumtv June 13, 2008
what in the hell are you talking about? And why don’t y0u even have the courage to give contact information. Typical.
csusandman June 12, 2008
From his Contact Info:
Michael@Rosenblumtv.com Note: I am more than happy to discuss my ideas, concepts and projects. However, personal attacks will be removed.
That last line is hilarious. He can’t stand on his own two feet on other boards and he can’t here either. What the hell:
I agree with $, though I won’t be as eloquent.
…you hack…
Mick May 19, 2008
Is this bloke on drugs?
Look in your dictionary under Oxygen-Thief, should see his picture there.
$ May 17, 2008
So the bad camera work doesn’t matter?
I guess J.K. Rowling didn’t need to worry about grammar or punctuation? I guess her formal, years long university training as an English teacher, had nothing to do with her fine creative writing abilities.
I look at that example of work, produced by a man who claims to know so much and wanting people to pay him to learn what he knows.
Then I laugh.
It’s like seeing a house, poorly built, that is falling down, then paying the contractor who built it to make one for you to live in.
By the way, the J.K. Rowling story related in that poorly shot video is full of false information about her and how she wrote the book.
! May 17, 2008
“wicked fine sense of humor”
that’ll come in handy… on his resume.
Jay Russell May 16, 2008
Good job on your message. Just getting out and doing it can pay off, worrying about how it is shot is an obvious response to stale jealous minds searching for the opportunity to reveal that they do believe in time alone and self gratification in petting zoos. Call me for new joke material!!!!
peter May 16, 2008
not sure I agree with everything you say $, but you have a wicked fine sense of humor
$ May 16, 2008
It was so poorly shot that it made it difficult to listen to whatever was being said. The poor shooting distracted from the message.
See, in visual communications, when one uses a camera as part of the message delivery process, the visuals should add to the audio. Not detract.
But you, with all your years of experience would know that. I’m sure Fred Friendly might even have mentioned something about how this is supposed to be tv, not radio. Or in your case, youtube, not an audio podcast.
Peter Ralph May 16, 2008
$ – I thought that too, then I saw the little rabbit waving and the whole thing made sense.
rosenblumtv May 16, 2008
Yes. And what did you think of the story, or did’t you follow?
$ May 16, 2008
Buy a light or at the very least learn not to shoot someone in front of a bright window. I am so impressed with your camera work. It’s a fine example of how well you know how to do your job.
Cliff Etzel May 16, 2008
Thanks for the pep talk Michael – great way to end the week.